Britain's Prince Charles and Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall react as their car is attacked, in London, Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010.
LONDON – Furious student protesters attacked a car carrying Prince Charles and his wife, Camilla, vandalized（毁坏，摧残） buildings and battled riot police Thursday as a controversial hike in university fees triggered Britain's worst political violence in years.

In a major security breach¹, demonstrators set upon the heir（继承人） to the throne's Rolls Royce as it drove through London's busy West End on its way to a theater. A group of up to 20 struck it with fists, sticks and bottles, breaking a window and splattering（飞溅） the gleaming black vehicle with paint.

In the frenzy², some chanted "off with their heads!"

Adnan Nazir, a 23-year-old podiatrist（足病医生） who was following the protesters, said Charles, 62, kept his calm, gently pushing his 63-year-old wife toward the floor to get her out of the line of fire.

"Charles got her on the floor and put his hands on her," Nazir said. "Charles was still waving and giving the thumb's up.

"It was just a surreal（离奇的，不真实的） thing," he said. "It was completely manic."

Charles' office, Clarence House, said the royal couple was unharmed. But the attack took police completely by surprise（出其不意） and raises serious security questions.

The chief of the Metropolitan³ Police, Paul Stephenson, said the force would launch an investigation⁴ into Thursday's violence.

Prime Minister David Cameron said the violence against the royal couple was "shocking and regrettable."

"It is clear that a minority of protesters came determined⁵ to provoke violence, attack the police and cause as much damage to property as possible," Cameron said. "They must face the full force of the law."

Police said it was unclear whether the royals had been deliberately⁶（故意地） targeted, or were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The couple arrived looking somber⁷（忧郁的，昏暗的） but composed at the London Palladium theater, where they were attending a Royal Variety Performance.

Camilla later managed to shrug⁸ off the ordeal⁹, saying there was "a first time for everything," the Press Association news agency reported.

Protesters erupted in anger after legislators in the House of Commons approved a plan to triple university fees to 9,000 pounds ($14,000) a year.

As thousands of students were corralled by police near Parliament, some strummed（漫不经心地弹） guitars and sang Beatles songs — but others hurled¹⁰ chunks¹¹ of paving stones at police and smashed windows in a government building.

Another group ran riot through the busy shopping streets of London's West End, smashing store windows and setting fire to a giant Christmas tree in Trafalgar Square.

Police condemned¹² the "wanton vandalism." They said 43 protesters and 12 officers had been injured, while 22 people were arrested. Police said the number of arrests would likely rise.

Home Secretary Theresa May said that "what we are seeing in London tonight, the wanton（嬉戏的） vandalism, smashing of windows, has nothing to do with peaceful protest."

The violence overshadowed the tuition vote, a crucial test for governing Conservative-Liberal Democrat¹³ coalition¹⁴, and for the government's austerity plans to reduce Britain's budget deficit¹⁵.

It was approved 323-302 in the House of Commons, a close vote given the government's 84-seat majority.

Many in the thousands-strong crowd outside booed and chanted "shame" when they heard the result of the vote, and pressed against metal barriers and lines of riot police penning them in.

Earlier small groups of protesters threw flares¹⁶, billiard balls and paint bombs, and officers, some on horses, rushed to reinforce the security cordon¹⁷.

The scuffles broke out after students marched through central London and converged¹⁸（聚集，会聚） on Parliament Square, waving placards and chanting "education is not for sale" to cap weeks of nationwide protests aimed at pressuring lawmakers to reverse course.

The vote put Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and his Liberal Democrat party in an awkward spot. Liberal Democrats¹⁹ signed a pre-election pledge to oppose any such tuition hike, and reserved the right to abstain²⁰ in the vote even though they are part of the governing coalition proposing the change.#p#分页标题#e#

Those protesting were particularly incensed²¹ by the broken pledge from Clegg's party.

"I'm here because the Liberal Democrats broke their promise," said 19-year-old Kings College student Shivan David. "I don't think education should be free but I do think that tripling fees doesn't make any sense. We are paying more for less."

Clegg defended the proposals, saying the plans represent the "best possible choice" at a time of economic uncertainty²².

But under intense political pressure, 21 Liberal Democrat lawmakers — more than a third of the total — voted against the fee hike. Another eight, including at least one government minister, abstained²³（自制，放弃） .

Experts warned that fallout from the policy could pose a greater risk after the vote.

"The real danger for the government is not that they won't pass it through, but that it will be a policy fiasco（惨败） ," said Patrick Dunleavy, a political science professor at the London School of Economics. "By picking this fight with the student body ... the government seems to have gotten itself into choppy water."

Cameron's government describes the move as a painful necessity to deal with a record budget deficit and a sputtering²⁴ economy. To balance its books, the U.K. passed a four-year package of spending cuts worth 81 billion pounds, which will eliminate hundreds of thousands of public sector²⁵ jobs and cut or curtail²⁶ hundreds of government programs.

Associated Press Writers Jill Lawless and Gillian Smith contributed to this report.