A global study by an international team including professor John Graves of the Virginia Institute of Marine¹ Science has found that several species of tunas（金枪鱼） and billfishes（长嘴鱼） are threatened and in need of further protection. The team's analysis -- published in a recent issue of Science magazine's Policy Forum² -- is the first study of global tuna and billfish populations using the methods of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

The IUCN Red List is the worldwide standard for assessing the status of species. Red List categories run from "least concern" to "near threatened," "vulnerable," "endangered," "critically endangered," "extinct in the wild," and "extinct." A threatened designation includes the middle three categories.

The study -- part of the broader Global Marine Species Assessment³ -- addresses concerns that the methods currently used to evaluate the status of tuna and billfish stocks are insufficient⁴ to sustainably manage the multi-national fisheries for these highly prized and highly priced fish -- in 2011, a single bluefin tuna sold for almost $400,000.

Stock assessments⁵ for tuna and billfish are typically based on catch data collected by Regional Fisheries Management Organizations, or RFMOs. Graves has served one of these organizations -- the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) -- for the past 16 years, chairing the Advisory⁶ Committee to its U.S. Section.

Standardizing⁷ and sharing data among RFMOs has proven difficult, thus hindering efforts to understand the overall population status of tuna and billfish species, many of which are distributed globally.

In the current study, a review team of fisheries experts from the U.S., Barbados, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Peru, Spain, Switzerland, and Taiwan first compiled a global database of information from fisheries reports and scientific publications. They then analyzed⁸ the data using IUCN Red List criteria⁹. Their results showed that 7 of the 61 species studied (11%) were threatened (i.e., vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered), 4 species (7%) were "near threatened," and 39 species (64%) were of "least concern." Eleven species (18%) lacked adequate data and were thus classified as "data deficient¹⁰."

The seven threatened species are southern bluefin tuna, Atlantic bluefin tuna, bigeye tuna, blue marlin, white marlin, and two species of Spanish mackerels. Graves says two main factors contribute to these fishes' troubled status: the tunas' high dollar value leads to heavy fishing pressure, and all the species are slow to reach sexual maturity¹¹, prolonging any recovery from over-fishing.

The proportion of threatened tuna and billfish species is higher than that of most other groups of marine bony fishes, with values closer to those recorded for other valuable and slow-reproducing species such as sharks. A previous IUCN study led by VIMS emeritus¹² professor Jack¹³ Musick found that 17 to 33% of shark, skate, and ray species are in the threatened category.

Graves and his co-authors write that the quickest road to recovery for the most-depleted stocks -- Southern and Atlantic bluefin tunas -- is to ban harvesting of these fishes until their populations can rebuild to healthy levels. They recognize that this would cause economic hardship and increase the incentive¹⁴（动机，刺激） for illegal fishing, and thus call for strong deterrents¹⁵（妨碍物） such as controlled international trade through a listing of these species on the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna¹⁶ and Flora¹⁷ (CITES).

The scientists note several examples where strict monitoring and compliance¹⁸ measures have led to successful recovery of tuna, mackerel（鲭鱼） , and billfish species.