Questions 8-9
Ornithologist1: The curvature of the claws of modern tree-dwelling birds enables them to perch2 in trees. The claws of Archeopteryx, the earlies known birdlike creature, show similar curvature that must have enabled the creature to perch on tree limbs. Therefore, Archeopteryx was probably a tree-dwelling creature.
Paleontologist: No, the ability to perch in trees is not good evidence that Archeopteryx was a tree-dwelling bird.Chickens also spend time perched in trees, yet chickens are primarily ground-dwelling.
8. In responding to the ornithologist's hypothesis that Archeopteryx was tree-dwelling, the paleontologist
(A) questions the qualifications of the ornithologist to evaluate the evidence
(B) denies the truth of the claims the ornithologist makes in support of the hypothesis
(C) uses a parallel case to illustrate3 a weakness in the ornithologist's argument
(D) shows that the hypothesis contradicts one of the pieces of evidence used to support it
(E) provides additional evidence to support the ornithologist's argument
9. Which one of the following is an assumption on which the ornithologist's reasoning depends?
(A) Modern tree-dwelling birds are the direct descendants of Archeopteryx.
(B) Archeopteryx made use of the curvature of its claws.
(C) There have never been tree-dwelling birds without curved claws.
(D) Archeopteryx was in fact the earliest birdlike creature.
(E) The curvature of the claws is the only available evidence for the laim that Archeopteryx was tree-dwelling.
10. There are rumors4 that the Premier5 will reshuffle the cabinet this week. However, every previous reshuffle that the Premier has made was preceded by meetings between the Premier and senior cabinet members. No such meetings have occurred or are planned. Therefore the rumors are most likely false.
Which one of the following most accurately6 expresses a principle of reasoning employed by the argument?
(A) When a conclusion follows logically from a set of premises7, the probability that the conclusion is true cannot be any less than the probability that the premises are all true
(B) A hypothesis is undermined when a state of affairs does not obtain that would be expected to obtain if the hypothesis were true.
(C) It is possible for a hypothesis to be false even though it is supported by all the available data.
(D) Even if in the past a phenomenon was caused by particular circumstances, it is erroneous to assume that the phenomenon will recur8 only under the circumstances in which it previously9 occured.
(E) If two statements are known to be inconsistent with each other and if one of the statements is known to be false, it cannot be deduced from these known facts that the other statement is true.
Questions 11-12
Carl: Researchers who perform operations on animals for experimental purposes are legally required to complete detailed10 pain protocols11 indicating whether the animals will be at risk of pain and, if so, what steps will be taken to minimize or alleviate12 it. Yet when human beings undergo operations, such protocols are never required. If lawmakers were as concerned about human beings as they seem to be about animals, there would be pain protocols for human beings too.
Debbie: But consider this: a person for whom a doctor wants to schedule surgery can simply be told what pain to expect and can then decide whether or not to undergo the operation. So you see, pain protocols are unnecessary for human beings.
11. Debbie attempts to counter Carl's argument by.
(A) showing that one of the claims on which Carl bases his conclusion is inaccurate
(B) pointing out a relevant difference to undermine an analogy on which Carl bases his conclusion
(C) claiming that Carl's argument should be rejected because it is based on an appeal to sentimentality rather than on reasoned principles
(D) drawing an analogy that illustrates13 a major flaw in Car's argument
(E) offering a specific example to demonstrate that Carl's argument is based on a claim that can be neither confirmed nor disproved.
12. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument made by Debbie in response to Car's argument?
(A) Not all operations that are performed on human beings are painful.
(B) Some experimentation14 that is now done on animals need not be done at all.
(C) Preparing pain protocols is not a time-consuming or costly15 procedure.
(D) Some surgical16 operations performed on infants are painful.
(E) Unalleviated pain after an operation tends to delay the healing process.
13. A company with long-outstanding bills owed by its customers can assign those bills to collection agency that pays the company a fraction of their amount and then tries to collect payment from the customers. Since these agencies pay companies only 15 percent of the total amount of the outstanding bills, a company interested in reducing losses from long-outstanding bills would be well advised to pursue its debtors17 on its own.
The argument depends on the assumption that
(A) a company that prusues its debtors on its own typically coliects more than 15 percent of the total amount of the long-outstanding bills that it is owed
(B) the cost to a company of pursuing its debtors on its own for payment of long-outstanding bills does not exceed 15 percent of the total amount of those bills
(C) collection agencies that are assigned bills for collection by companies are unsuccessful in collecting, on average, only 15 percent of the total amount of those bills.
(D) at least 15 percent of the coustomers that owe money to companies eventually pay their bills whether or not those bills are assigned to a collection agency
(E) unless most of the customers of a company pay their bills, that company in the long run will not be profitable.
14. Herbalist: Many of my customers find that their physical coordination18 improves after drinking juice containing certain herbs. A few doctors assert that the herbs are potentially harmful, but doctors are always trying to maintain a monopoly over medical therapies. So there is no reason not to try my herb juice.
The reasoning in the herbalist's argument is flawed because the argument
(A) attempts to force acceptance of a claim by inducing fear of the consequences of rejecting that claim
(B) bases a conclusion on claims that are inconsistent with each other
(C) rejects a claim by attacking the proponents19 of the claim rather than addressing the claim itself
(D) relies on evidence presented in terms that presuppose the truth of the claim for which the evidence is offered.
(E) mistakes the observation that one thing happens after another for proof that the second thing is the result of the first
15. Because of the lucrative20 but illegal trade in rhinoceros21 horns a certain rhinoceros species has been hunted nearly to extinction22. Therefore an effective way to ensure the survival of that species would be to periodically trim off the horns of all rhinoceroses23 thereby24 eliminating the motivation for poaching
Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?
(A) Most poachers who are discouraged from hunting rhinoceroses are not likely to hunt other animals for their horns.
(B) At least some rhinoceroses whose horns are periodically trimmed off will be able to attract mates.
(C) Poachers hunt at least some immature25 rhinoceroses whose horns have not yet started to develop.
(D) The demand for rhinoceros horns will remain constant even if the supply decreases after the periodic trimming-off of the rhinoceros horns has begun.
(E) Rhinoceroses whose horns have been trimmed off are unable to defend themselves against predators26.
收听单词发音 
