Researchers at the Yerkes National Primate¹ Research Center, Emory University, are the first to show chimpanzees possess a sense of fairness that has previously² been attributed as uniquely human. Working with colleagues from Georgia State University, the researchers played the Ultimatum³ Game with the chimpanzees to determine how sensitive the animals are to the reward distribution between two individuals if both need to agree on the outcome. The researchers say the findings, available in an early online edition of the Proceedings⁴ of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) available this week, suggest a long evolutionary⁵ history of the human aversion（厌恶） to inequity as well as a shared preference for fair outcomes by the common ancestor of humans and apes.

 

According to first author Darby Proctor, PhD, "We used the Ultimatum Game because it is the gold standard to determine the human sense of fairness. In the game, one individual needs to propose a reward division to another individual and then have that individual accept the proposition before both can obtain the rewards. Humans typically offer generous portions, such as 50 percent of the reward, to their partners, and that's exactly what we recorded in our study with chimpanzees."

 

Co-author Frans de Waal, PhD, adds, "Until our study, the behavioral economics community assumed the Ultimatum Game could not be played with animals or that animals would choose only the most selfish option while playing. We've concluded that chimpanzees not only get very close to the human sense of fairness, but the animals may actually have exactly the same preferences（选择权） as our own species." For purposes of direct comparison, the study was also conducted separately with human children.

 

In the study, researchers tested six adult chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and 20 human children (ages 2 -- 7 years) on a modified Ultimatum Game. One individual chose between two differently colored tokens that, with his or her partner's cooperation, could be exchanged for rewards (small food rewards for chimpanzees and stickers for children). One token offered equal rewards to both players, whereas the other token favored the individual making the choice at the expense of his or her partner. The chooser then needed to hand the token to the partner, who needed to exchange it with the experimenter for food. This way, both individuals needed to be in agreement.

 

Both the chimpanzees and the children responded like adult humans typically do. If the partner's cooperation was required, the chimpanzees and children split the rewards equally. However, with a passive partner, who had no chance to reject the offer, chimpanzees and children chose the selfish option.

点击收听单词发音