(单词翻译:单击)
Remarks of President Barack Obama
As Prepared for Delivery
The White House
April 17, 2010
There were many causes of the turmoil1(混乱,骚动) that ripped through(裂开,横撞直闯) our economy over the past two years. But above all, this crisis was caused by failures in the financial industry. What is clear is that this crisis could have been avoided if Wall Street firms were more accountable, if financial dealings were more transparent2, and if consumers and shareholders3 were given more information and authority to make decisions.
But that did not happen. And that’s because special interests have waged(进行,开始) a relentless5(无情的,残酷的) campaign to thwart6(阻碍,挫败) even basic, common-sense rules – rules to prevent abuse and protect consumers. In fact, the financial industry and its powerful lobby have opposed modest safeguards against the kinds of reckless(鲁莽的) risks and bad practices that led to this very crisis.
The consequences of this failure of responsibility – from Wall Street to Washington – are all around us: 8 million jobs lost, trillions in savings7 erased8, countless9 dreams diminished(减少,削弱) or denied. I believe we have to do everything we can to ensure that no crisis like this ever happens again. That’s why I’m fighting so hard to pass a set of Wall Street reforms and consumer protections. A plan for reform is currently moving through Congress.
Here’s what this plan would do. First, it would enact10 the strongest consumer financial protections ever. It would put consumers back in the driver’s seat by forcing big banks and credit card companies to provide clear, understandable information so that Americans can make financial decisions that work best for them.
Next, these reforms would bring new transparency to financial dealings. Part of what led to this crisis was firms like AIG and others making huge and risky11 bets – using things like derivatives12(派生物) – without accountability. Warren Buffett himself once described derivatives bought and sold with little oversight13 as “financial weapons of mass destruction.” That’s why through reform we’d help ensure that these kinds of complicated financial transactions(处理,会报) take place on an open market. Because, ultimately, it is a marketplace that is open, free, and fair that will allow our economy to flourish.
We would also close loopholes(漏洞,枪眼) to stop the kind of recklessness and irresponsibility we’ve seen. It’s these loopholes that allowed executives to take risks that not only endangered their companies, but also our entire economy. And we’re going to put in place new rules so that big banks and financial institutions will pay for the bad decisions they make – not taxpayers15. Simply put, this means no more taxpayer14 bailouts. Never again will taxpayers be on the hook because a financial company is deemed “too big to fail.”
Finally, these reforms hold Wall Street accountable by giving shareholders new power in the financial system. They’ll get a say on pay: a vote on the salaries and bonuses awarded to top executives. And the SEC will ensure that shareholders have more power in corporate16 elections, so that investors17 and pension holders4 have a stronger voice in determining what happens with their life savings.
Now, unsurprisingly, these reforms have not exactly been welcomed by the people who profit from the status quo – as well their allies in Washington. This is probably why the special interests have spent a lot of time and money lobbying to kill or weaken the bill. Just the other day, in fact, the Leader of the Senate Republicans and the Chair of the Republican Senate campaign committee met with two dozen top Wall Street executives to talk about how to block progress on this issue.
Lo and behold18, when he returned to Washington, the Senate Republican Leader came out against the common-sense reforms we’ve proposed. In doing so, he made the cynical19 and deceptive20(迷惑的,欺诈的) assertion that reform would somehow enable future bailouts – when he knows that it would do just the opposite. Every day we don’t act, the same system that led to bailouts remains21 in place – with the exact same loopholes and the exact same liabilities. And if we don’t change what led to the crisis, we’ll doom22 ourselves to repeat it. That’s the truth. Opposing reform will leave taxpayers on the hook if a crisis like this ever happens again.
So my hope is that we can put this kind of politics aside. My hope is that Democrats23 and Republicans can find common ground and move forward together. But this is certain: one way or another, we will move forward. This issue is too important. The costs of inaction are too great. We will hold Wall Street accountable. We will protect and empower consumers in our financial system. That’s what reform is all about. That’s what we’re fighting for. And that’s exactly what we’re going to achieve.
Thank you.
1
turmoil
![]() |
|
n.骚乱,混乱,动乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
transparent
![]() |
|
adj.明显的,无疑的;透明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
shareholders
![]() |
|
n.股东( shareholder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
holders
![]() |
|
支持物( holder的名词复数 ); 持有者; (支票等)持有人; 支托(或握持)…之物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
relentless
![]() |
|
adj.残酷的,不留情的,无怜悯心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
thwart
![]() |
|
v.阻挠,妨碍,反对;adj.横(断的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
savings
![]() |
|
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
erased
![]() |
|
v.擦掉( erase的过去式和过去分词 );抹去;清除 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
countless
![]() |
|
adj.无数的,多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
enact
![]() |
|
vt.制定(法律);上演,扮演 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
risky
![]() |
|
adj.有风险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
derivatives
![]() |
|
n.衍生性金融商品;派生物,引出物( derivative的名词复数 );导数 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
oversight
![]() |
|
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
taxpayer
![]() |
|
n.纳税人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
taxpayers
![]() |
|
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
corporate
![]() |
|
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
investors
![]() |
|
n.投资者,出资者( investor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
behold
![]() |
|
v.看,注视,看到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
cynical
![]() |
|
adj.(对人性或动机)怀疑的,不信世道向善的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
deceptive
![]() |
|
adj.骗人的,造成假象的,靠不住的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
remains
![]() |
|
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
doom
![]() |
|
n.厄运,劫数;v.注定,命定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
democrats
![]() |
|
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|