(单词翻译:单击)
THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody. Good morning. Before I begin, I want to say a brief word about the historic vote which took place early this morning. The United States Senate knocked down a filibuster海盗,暴兵 aimed at blocking a final vote on health care reform, and scored a big victory for the American people. By standing2 up to the special interests -- who've prevented reform for decades and who are furiously lobbying against it now -- the Senate has moved us closer to reform that makes a tremendous极大的,巨大的 difference for families, for seniors, for businesses, and for the country as a whole.
For those who have insurance, reform will mean greater security and stability. No longer will people with preexisting先前存在 conditions be excluded from coverage3. No longer will people who are seriously ill be dropped from coverage. And no longer will families be allowed to go broke because they’re forced to pay exorbitant4过高的,过分的 out-of-pocket expenses.
Many people recall the enormous fights around the Patient's Bill of Rights that never got done. Well, you know what, the Patient's Bill of Rights is embedded5 in this health care bill and -- to make sure that all Americans who have insurance right now are getting a fair deal from their insurance companies.
Small businesses and those who don’t get insurance through their employer will finally be able to get insurance at a price that they can afford with tax credits to help. And Medicare will be stronger and its solvency6偿付能力 extended by nearly a decade. Seniors will get more assistance with prescription7 drug处方药物 costs than they're getting right now. And finally, these reforms will help the inexorable不可阻挡的,无法改变的 and unsustainable rise in health care costs that are overwhelming families, businesses, and the federal budget.
The Congressional Budget Office now reports that this bill will reduce our deficit8 by $132 billion over the first decade, and by as much as $1.3 trillion in the decade after that. So I just want to be clear, for all those who are continually carping about how this is somehow a big spending government bill, this cuts our deficit by $132 billion the first 10 years, and by over a trillion in the second. That argument that opponents are making against this bill does not hold water.
Now, embracing this kind of responsibility in Washington is what also brings us here today. I am pleased to be joined this morning by my Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Ric Shinseki; my budget director, Peter Orszag; and our special guest, last but not least, the winner of the first annual SAVE Award -- and that's Nancy Fichtner of Loma, Colorado.
Having met with Nancy a few minutes ago, I can tell you Nancy means business. She is a single working mom; she's a clerk with the VA; she's an artist; she's an outdoorswoman; and she is an avid9渴望的,贪婪的 hunter. In fact, somewhere in the western United States, there is an elk10麋鹿 that is breathing a sigh of relief because Nancy is here instead of where she would have been: hunting with her kids. (Laughter.) And I believe her children are here -- where's Nancy's kids? There they are right there. It's great to see you guys. Nancy's daughter -- she skins and guts11 her elk, so don't mess with胡乱摆弄,干扰 her either. (Laughter.)
We're all here for a simple reason. At a time when we face not only a fiscal12 crisis, but also a host of difficult challenges as a nation, business as usual in Washington just won't cut it. We need a government that's more efficient, that's more effective, and far more fiscally13 responsible.
When my administration walked through the door, the country faced a growing economic downturn as well as a deepening fiscal hole. Washington had passed massive tax cuts for the wealthy and an expensive new entitlement program without paying for any of it. Health care costs continued to rise, year after year. And little effort was made to cut wasteful14 spending. As a result, over the previous eight years, the national debt doubled -- doubled. In January, the deficit stood at $1.3 trillion. And we had to make the difficult decision to add to the deficit in the short term to prevent the potential collapse15 of our economy.
But as I've said, in the long run, we can't continue to spend as if deficits16 don't have consequences; as if waste doesn't matter; as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like Monopoly money. That's what we've seen time and time again. Washington has been more concerned about the next election than the next generation. It's put off hard choices in spending bill after spending bill, budget after bloated budget.
Government contracting is a perfect example. Between 2002 and 2008, the amount spent on government contracts more than doubled. The amount spent on no-bid, non-competitive contracts jumped by 129 percent. This is an inexcusable waste of money. And that's why, back in March, I ordered federal departments and agencies to come up with plans to save up to $40 billion a year in contracting by 2011. And over the past six months, agencies have been making cuts by looking for better deals, by ending contracts and doing work in house, and by opening up no-bid contracts to competitive bidding. Because of these efforts, I'm proud to announce today that we are on track to meet our goals. Twenty-four departments have identified more than $19 billion in savings17 for this year alone.
And this is only the latest example. At my very first Cabinet meeting, I directed every secretary to join us in scouring18 the budget, line by line, to find ways to make government more efficient and less wasteful. Together, we identified more than 100 programs to scale back or end completely, as well as other ways to cut costs, finding $17 billion in savings so far.
We're also going after roughly $100 billion wasted on improper19 payments to contractors20, organizations, and individuals. To put this in perspective, these mistakes, and in some cases abuses, cost taxpayers22 more each year than the budgets for the Education and Homeland Security Departments combined.
We have done what some said was impossible: preventing wasteful spending on outdated23 weapons systems that even the Pentagon said it doesn't need. And I’ve insisted from the beginning that health care reform will not add one dime24 to our deficit. And as I just noted25, not only is it not adding to our deficit, it's actually reducing it.
Finally, I’ve issued a challenge to every man and woman who works for the federal government: If you see a way that government could do its job better, or do the same job for less money, I want to know about it. That’s why we started the SAVE Award, to draw on those who know government best to improve how government works. We asked federal employees to submit reform proposals based on their experiences. And in a testament26 to the seriousness with which these folks are taking their jobs, we received more than 38,000 proposals in just three weeks.
From these submissions27, four finalists were selected and put to an online vote. Nancy is here because she won. Her idea stems from her experience at the VA Medical Center where she works. She noticed that whenever patients left the hospital, leftover28 medications like eye drops or inhalers were just thrown away. And often, veterans would have to go right back to the pharmacy29 to refill what was discarded. So the VA is paying twice -- it’s waste, plain and simple. And thanks to Nancy -- and to Secretary Shinseki and the folks at Veterans Affairs -- we’re putting a stop to it. The change is already underway.
Of course, Nancy’s proposal was just one of many great ideas that came to us. We’ve already begun to implement30 a host of suggestions made through the SAVE contest. And while promoting electronic paystubs or scheduling Social Security appointments online or re-purposing unused government supplies may not be the most glamorous31 reforms in history, when taken together, these small changes can add up; they add up to a transformation32 of how government works.
And that’s why we’re going to turn the SAVE Award into an annual event. That’s why we’re holding a forum33 at the White House next month to seek more ideas from the private sector34, specifically about how we can better use technology to reform our government for the 21st century.
After years of irresponsibility, we are once again taking responsibility for every dollar we spend, the same way families do. It’s true that what I’ve described today will not be enough to get us out of our fiscal mess by itself. We face a deficit that will take some tough decisions in the next year’s budget and in years to come to get under control. But these changes will save the American people billions of dollars. And they’ll help to put in place a government that’s more efficient and effective, that wastes less money on no-bid contracts, that’s cutting bureaucracy and harnessing technology, that’s more fiscally responsible, and that better serve the American taxpayer21. That’s the government we need. That’s the government I intend to implement. That's the kind of government that the American people deserve. And that’s the kind of government that people like Nancy are helping35 to build each and every day.
So, Nancy, congratulations. We're proud of you. Thank you so much. Thank you. We're very proud of your mom. (Laughter.) That's great.
Thank you, everybody.
END
11:31 A.M. EST
1
filibuster
![]() |
|
n.妨碍议事,阻挠;v.阻挠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
standing
![]() |
|
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
coverage
![]() |
|
n.报导,保险范围,保险额,范围,覆盖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
exorbitant
![]() |
|
adj.过分的;过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
embedded
![]() |
|
a.扎牢的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
solvency
![]() |
|
n.偿付能力,溶解力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
prescription
![]() |
|
n.处方,开药;指示,规定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
deficit
![]() |
|
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
avid
![]() |
|
adj.热心的;贪婪的;渴望的;劲头十足的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
elk
![]() |
|
n.麋鹿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
guts
![]() |
|
v.狼吞虎咽,贪婪地吃,飞碟游戏(比赛双方每组5人,相距15码,互相掷接飞碟);毁坏(建筑物等)的内部( gut的第三人称单数 );取出…的内脏n.勇气( gut的名词复数 );内脏;消化道的下段;肠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
fiscal
![]() |
|
adj.财政的,会计的,国库的,国库岁入的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
fiscally
![]() |
|
在国库方面,财政上,在国库岁入方面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
wasteful
![]() |
|
adj.(造成)浪费的,挥霍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
collapse
![]() |
|
vi.累倒;昏倒;倒塌;塌陷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
deficits
![]() |
|
n.不足额( deficit的名词复数 );赤字;亏空;亏损 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
savings
![]() |
|
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
scouring
![]() |
|
擦[洗]净,冲刷,洗涤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
improper
![]() |
|
adj.不适当的,不合适的,不正确的,不合礼仪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
contractors
![]() |
|
n.(建筑、监造中的)承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
taxpayer
![]() |
|
n.纳税人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
taxpayers
![]() |
|
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
outdated
![]() |
|
adj.旧式的,落伍的,过时的;v.使过时 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
dime
![]() |
|
n.(指美国、加拿大的钱币)一角 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
noted
![]() |
|
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
testament
![]() |
|
n.遗嘱;证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
submissions
![]() |
|
n.提交( submission的名词复数 );屈从;归顺;向法官或陪审团提出的意见或论据 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
leftover
![]() |
|
n.剩货,残留物,剩饭;adj.残余的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
pharmacy
![]() |
|
n.药房,药剂学,制药业,配药业,一批备用药品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
implement
![]() |
|
n.(pl.)工具,器具;vt.实行,实施,执行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
glamorous
![]() |
|
adj.富有魅力的;美丽动人的;令人向往的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
transformation
![]() |
|
n.变化;改造;转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
forum
![]() |
|
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
sector
![]() |
|
n.部门,部分;防御地段,防区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
helping
![]() |
|
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|